AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

ion.design — v1 vs v2

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v1Last audited 150 days ago
50
→
39
-11
Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
0/10
10/10
+10
Q&A Content Format
10/10
8/10
-2
Clean, Crawlable HTML
9/10
5/10
-4
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
10/10
+5
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4/10
2/10
-2
Internal Linking Structure
4/10
0/10
-4
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
7/10
2/10
-5
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
0/10
-2
Definition Patterns
5/10
7/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
3/10
2/10
-1
Fact & Data Density
8/10
3/10
-5
Content Cannibalization
0/10
5/10
+5
Content Depth
4/10
3/10
-1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
7/10
4/10
-3
First-Hand Experience Signals
3/10
2/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
8/10
6/10
-2
Answer-First Placement
5/10
0/10
-5
Evidence Packaging
1/10
0/10
-1
Entity Disambiguation
6/10
0/10
-6
Extraction Friction Score
2/10
3/10
+1
Image Context for AI
3/10
5/10
+2
Page Speed: Server Response
7/10
8/10
+1
Page Speed: Page Size
7/10
9/10
+2
Answer Capsule Pattern
4/10
5/10
+1
Entity Density
6/10
0/10
-6
Increase Fact & Data DensityAdd Answer-First PlacementAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd Content Freshness Signals